Here’s a new Economist article that argues we must entertain strange ideas. Fortunately, this is wrong. Entertaining strange ideas for its own sake is unequivocally not the point of any intellectual exploration. Rather, we must follow the evidence and logic wherever it goes for the sake of truth. Sometimes, it’s a novel idea that’s true, and if we are real seekers, we must accept ideas that are anomalous, not intuitive, hurt our feelings, and/or are against our traditional morality. The whole point of intellectual pursuits is, happily, not to be a fucking weirdo. It’s to find truth.
What’s New
Try this trick to get rich! (Like my clickbait?)
The Most Heinous Crime
What happens to a mind deferred? On MAGA and propaganda.
Hope, healing, and justice for sexual assault
USA Energy Independence
How to respond to the current threat of nuclear war: USA Edition
Daniel Callcut, PhD: Artists & Morality
“Paul Gauguin, the National Gallery and the philosophical conundrum of exhibiting immoral artists. What responsibilities do galleries have when they display work by monstrous creators?”
Read the text article at Prospect Magazine.
FULL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Callcut and I are friends and colleagues.
